Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Your Cart   |   Sign In
CFHA Blog
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (281) posts »

Mental Health: Come Out, Come Out Wherever You Are!

Posted By Ben Miller, Friday, September 11, 2009
Updated: Wednesday, June 01, 2011

As the health reform debate rages, so many numbers, names, and "theories" are thrown around, we have to ask ourselves the question: "where is mental health"? You see, being a mental health professional committed to seeing the divide between mental health and physical health erased, I want to know that the next version of health "care" comprehensively addresses the needs of the whole person. So, I always make sure to try and see where mental health sits within any discussion on healthcare. To this end, I follow blogs, check certain websites, read bills, etc. to get a better sense if the artificial divide between systems will be erased.

My findings: mental health is not part of the larger health reform discussion (that I can see) - if we are talking HEALTH REFORM, shouldn't we include all aspects of health?

Now, here me on this one, I know the mental health community is actively engaged in advocacy around parity, but is this sufficient?

Watching the President's speech to Congress two nights ago, I kept wanting to hear something about mental health - that is too much to hope for. I follow Twitter to see what other thought leaders (yes, they are on Twitter) have to say on #healthreform (a Twitter technique), etc. I see brilliant articles, discussions, ideas, but none include mental health. Being a Twitter amateur, I try to push for integrating mental health into the discussion as often as possible, but this is not going to get the message that now is the time to end the separate histories of mental and physical health and defragment healthcare. Still, I try and use any and all any means necessary to bring attention to this issue. If you are feeling adventurous, you can follow me on Twitter - miller7

Am I off base here?


This post has not been tagged.

Share |
Permalink | Comments (6)
 

Comments on this post...

Randall Reitz says...
Posted Friday, July 08, 2011
Ben, I share your frustration with the void of mental health discussion in the healthcare debate. I attribute this to a number of causes:

The body/mind split that typifies the healthcare lobby. The mental health lobby is mostly agnostic to the larger healthcare debate because it doesn't really involve their funds. In this they are short-sighted because I believe that designated funds and carve-outs for mental health will eventually disappear and then we will be more under-funded than now.

Collaborative Care has yet to make a strong case for the need to integrate behavioral specialists in primary care. The IMPACT research probably makes the best financial case for care coordination, but they use extended-duty nursing staff rather than mental health professionals for care coordination and problem-solving therapy. Their findings might actually undermine rather than reinforce our case.

Legislation requires "bumper sticker messages" that people can write on posters and yell at congressional meetings. Integrated care is a nuanced model that is difficult to simmer down.

I do think that Twitter is a way to reach a broad audience with bumper sticker tweets that connect them with more information. Thanks for taking the lead on this.
Permalink to this Comment }

Peter Y. Fifield says...
Posted Friday, July 08, 2011
Descartes has proven to be more of an issue that I originally thought! Back in August, President Obama visited the seacoast area and I was fortunate enough to attend. One of the audience members asked the President about the role of mental health in the reform efforts. His response was positive in that he confirmed his support for parity of mental health in the reform process. That being said, after reading the Parity Act, I'm not that optimistic about the government's operational definition of "parity.
Permalink to this Comment }

CFHA Admin says...
Posted Friday, July 08, 2011
o as I mentioned above, parity in and of itself is not sufficient. Please read the Cunningham Health Affairs article for more info on his take. It is great that the President is aware of the mental health community. If we want to transform the healthcare system, we need more than just awareness - we need creativity and vision to end the fragmentation that plagues our healthcare system. Could vision come through our publications, research networks, or even our social networks??? Now is our time to make our voice heard!
Permalink to this Comment }

Peter Y. Fifield says...
Posted Friday, July 08, 2011
My name is Jeff Goldsmith and I wanted to respond to several points. I am a psychiatrist and an addiction expert with the American Society of Addiction Medicine, Board. We have been pushing hard for several years to get Parity for mental health and addictions and were thrilled to get it last year. I have chaired a symposium about Parity two years ago and they indicated that anti-parity folks continue to fight parity for years and Vermont had to pass three parity laws to get things moving in parity for their state. While i am not political in general, I thought this issue was crucial for the moment. We need a national system that supports Parity in principle, and we don't have it yet. So keep an eye pealed, and this Fall is the time for guidelines to come out for Parity. So far the President's cabinet members haven't come out with guidelines.

Second, your organizational name includes Collaboration, which i wholeheartedly support. Collaboration is crucial for primary care and family health care. Half of mental healthcare is done by primary care providers and not psychiatrists. So we all need to collaborate with each other to provide the best care. I wish that Congress would collaborate more too. Medical Educators have not taught collaboration well in the past and I hope we do a better job in the future. Collaboration is not consultation, nor referral. It is working together, and you know that well in your position.
Permalink to this Comment }

Ben Miller says...
Posted Friday, July 08, 2011
Jeff, thank you first for your post, and second for all the work you have done to advance mental health. You are right that we need to take advantage of any and all opportunities to advance mental health anyway we can. My post, and your response both highlight the need for large scale (read national) change in a fragmented and flawed system. In today's senate finance committee bill (Chairman's Mark - Baucus), there is mention of mental health and required coverage of mental health and substance use. I honestly need more time to get to what this means, but it is at least a start. Let's continue to collaborate on this issue as often as we can. Good points and great discussion.
Permalink to this Comment }

Teresa Masdon says...
Posted Friday, July 08, 2011
Jeff, you make a valid point regarding how family medicine educators may have a particular influence on the practice of collaboration. My recent dissertation (2/09) examined the referral practices of family physicians with a national survey of AAFP's national research network. The participants voiced what they consider a "void" in optimal mental health services for their patients. The results suggest family physicians' unfamiliarity with the various psychotherapists available to their patients (counselors, family therapists, social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists). Further studies need to be done exploring the depth of understanding that family practice residents and medical students are given regarding the services of different talk therapists. Without completely appreciating the unique expertise of various psychotherapists, it is not surprising that collaboration would be limited.
Permalink to this Comment }

Community Search
Sign In


Forgot your password?

Haven't registered yet?

CFHA Calendar

10/13/2016 » 10/15/2016
CFHA 2016 Conference: "Celebrating the Many Faces and Places of Integration"